. .


Germany Thinks YouTube is Omniscient

April 21, 2012 12:16:17.022

Here's how stupid copyright battles have gotten:

"YouTube must take measures to prevent violations in future," said GEMA's lawyer Kerstin Baecker. "The court has clearly rejected the argument that YouTube as a host is not responsible for users' content."

That sounds reasonable until you sit back and consider reality: how can any company possibly install filters that are aware of all copyrighted material - especially given the fact that new material is being created all the time, and the backlog of extant material is so large as to be effectively infinite. It's simply not possible to do what is being asked here.

If this kind of thing holds up, then no site that accepts user generated content - Facebook, YouTube, Flickr, blog servers (etc. etc) can safely operate. Ultimately, this makes it very clear as to what the content industry wants to see happen: they want the net reduced back to a broadcast only thing, akin to TV and radio.

posted by James Robertson


Re: Germany Thinks YouTube is Omniscient

[anonymoose] April 23, 2012 9:43:30.832

Perhaps I can intermediate.

Create a new site [link 1]

Copyright holders can post what they feel is copyrighted there.

Youtube, other sites, and individuals would be expected to download the contents, checksum them with a cryptographically secure hash, and be sure not to post anything with the identical checksum.

The copyright holders would be responsible for maintaining the site and supplying its network capacity.

This should satisfy all parties.

[1 http://www.copyrighted-material.de/]

Re: Germany Thinks YouTube is Omniscient

[James Robertson] April 23, 2012 10:02:43.486

Except.... YouTube doesn't upload materials - users of the site do. That's a crucial difference, and one your "solution" does not address. In fact, it's a non-solution, as it helps convert the net into a broadcast only mechanism.

 Share Tweet This